Site icon Koyn

Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Explained

Proof-of-Stake

Since proof-of-work (PoW) became popular in 2009 when Bitcoin went mainstream, there have been numerous concerns about its sustainability. Proof-of-stake (PoS) was developed in 2012 as a solution to Bitcoin’s high energy consumption. The efforts appear to have been successful because PoS has been adopted by many blockchain networks for its energy efficiency and scalability.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

In this article, we’ll be explaining Proof-of-stake (PoS) in detail. Follow closely til the end to understand the benefits, challenges, and how this consensus mechanism has evolved since its inception.

What is Proof-of-Stake (PoS)?

Proof-of-stake (PoS) is a consensus method that allows a decentralized network to agree on the current version of the blockchain. However, unlike proof-of-work (PoW), which uses computational energy, PoS validators verify transactions by staking their coins as collateral. Here is a quick overview of how proof-of-stake (PoS) is done:

Advantages of Proof-of-Stake (PoS) to PoW

When compared with proof-of-work (PoW), proof-of-stake (PoS) is a more appealing option for modern blockchain networks because of the following reasons:

  1. Decentralization: The barrier to becoming a validator on a proof-of-stake (PoS) network is much lower than that of PoW. Only those who have specialized hardware can mine with PoW. However, in PoS, all you need is a sufficient stake amount. Thus, PoS is more distributed because more people can participate in the process.
  1. Energy efficiency: PoS is more environmentally friendly because it consumes far less energy than PoW. This is because validators are chosen based on their staked coins rather than by solving complex mathematical puzzles.
  1. Scalability: PoS blockchains process transactions quickly because of the absence of mining. As a result of this efficiency, these networks have lower latency and can handle higher transaction volume.
  1. Security: PoS validators have a vested interest in maintaining the blockchain’s integrity. Because of the economic incentives, they’d rather commit to securing the network than losing their coins to malicious actions.

Challenges of Proof-of-Stake (PoS)

Without prejudice to its benefits, proof-of-stake (PoS) has the following downsides:

  1. Wealth concentration: Since PoS validators are selected based on the size of their stake, those with more coins are more likely to be chosen. In the long run, this can create a cyclic process where the rich get richer, which can ultimately lead to a centralization of power with the blockchain.
  1. Security risk of instability: The “nothing-at-stake” problem can happen in PoS systems since validators do not need significant computational energy. As such, they have nothing to lose by simultaneously verifying opposing chains during events like a fork. Stakers can decide to validate blocks on every potential chain to gain reward on anyone that finally emerges as the main chain.
  1. Complexity: PoS blockchains are often more difficult to design when compared with PoW systems. The need to carefully design staking mechanisms, slashing conditions, and validator selection algorithms adds extra layers of complexity. If these mechanisms are not properly managed, they can introduce vulnerabilities to the network.

Types of Proof-of-Stake (PoS)

Over the years, different variations of PoS have been developed to address some of the challenges discussed above. As such, they have helped to improve the overall efficiency of this consensus mechanism. Some of the major types include:

  1. Delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS): Here, stakeholders delegate a small number of people to validate transactions and create blocks on their behalf. Networks like EOS and TRON use DPoS.
  1. Nominated proof-of-stake (NPoS): Networks such as Polkadot use this approach to balance decentralization. NPoS involves nominators backing validators with their stakes. The network then chooses a validator based on the total stakes supporting them.
  1. Leased proof-of-stake (LPoS): In LPoS, stakeholders lease their coins to validators without transferring ownership. In turn, stakeholders earn rewards without becoming active validators, thus increasing participation in the network. 
  1. Hybrid PoW/PoS: This method combines the security of PoW and the efficiency of PoS. Here, PoW miners create blocks, but they can’t be added to the blockchain until PoS validators approve them.

Final Words

Proof-of-stake (PoS) is indeed a more sustainable and scalable alternative to proof-of-work (PoW). Moreover, it encourages fairness, inclusivity, and better decentralization. As the security of cryptocurrency continues to mature, proof-of-stake (PoS) is poised to remain at the forefront of driving efficiency and security in blockchain innovation.

Exit mobile version